Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — HX v Council
(Case C‑540/18 P)(1)
(Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded)
1. Appeal — Grounds — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility
(Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 169(2))
(see paras 34, 35, 39, 45)
2. Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility
(Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170(1))
(see paras 36, 37, 42)
3. Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted — No such distortion
(Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)
(see paras 43, 44, 52)
4. Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Prohibition of entry and transit and freezing of funds of certain persons and entities responsible for violent repression against the civilian population — Restriction on free movement in the Union — Exemptions on grounds of urgent humanitarian need — Breach of principle of proportionality — None
(Art. 21(1) TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 52(1); Council Decision 2013/255/PESC, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2015/1836, Art. 27(9))
(see para. 61)
5. Judicial proceedings — Time limit for producing evidence –Article 85(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Submission of evidence before the oral part of the procedure is closed — Whether permissible — Conditions — Delay — Justification — None
(Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 85(3))
(see paras 65-67)
Operative part
The Court:
1.
Dismisses the appeal;
2.
Orders HX to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.
المعلومات الأساسية
تاريخ الصدور
iranDocument
رقم الوثيقة
نوع الوثيقة
اللغة
كود الذاكرة السورية
الجهة المصدرة
وثائق أخرى للجهة المصدرة
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2016/04/07
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 — Scope — Recognition of a private divorce pronounced by a religious court in a third country — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2016/05/12
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2016/04/07
Appeals — Restrictive measures against Syria — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Listing criterion — Broad discretion available to the Council — Burden of proof
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/01/08
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-563/11 Anbouba v Council
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/01/08
Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-592/11 Anbouba v Council
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/01/31
شخصيات مرتبطة
لايوجد معلومات حالية
كيانات متعلقة
لايوجد معلومات حالية
يوميات مرتبطة
لايوجد معلومات حالية