محكمة العدل الأوروبية

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-563/11 Anbouba v Council

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

Appeals — Restrictive measures against Syria — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Listing criterion — Broad discretion available to the Council — Burden of proof

Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-592/11 Anbouba v Council

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 — Scope — Recognition of a private divorce pronounced by a religious court in a third country — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Restrictive measures against a person listed in an annex to a decision

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Restrictive measures against a person listed in an annex to a decision

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection

References for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Borders, asylum and immigration — Rules on the grant of refugee status

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 — Article 25(1)(a) — Visa with limited territorial validity — Issuing of a visa on humanitarian grounds or because of international obligations

Area of freedom, security and justice – Borders, asylum and immigration

Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU-Turkey statement of the European Council of 18 March 2016 — Application for annulment

Appeal — Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Admissibility — Procedure for modifying the application — Need to modify the pleas in law and arguments — Restrictive measures adopted against the Syrian Arab Republic — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name

Appeal — Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Admissibility — Procedure for modification of the application — Need to modify pleas in law and arguments — Restrictive measures against Syria — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name

Appeal brought on 31 July 2017 by Rami Makhlouf against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 18 May 2017 in Case T-410/16, Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria and against influential members of the Assad and Makhlouf families — Rights of defence — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2018 — Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union, European Commission

Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded

Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded

Appeal brought on 17 August 2018 by HX against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 June 2018 in Case T-408/16 HX v Council of the European Union

Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria – List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Ehab Makhlouf against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-409/16 Makhlouf v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Othman v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Razan Othman v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Razan Othman against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-416/16 Othman v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-411/16 Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — Conditions for granting refugee status — Directive 2011/95/EU

Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Syria

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 July 2020 — George Haswani v Council of the European Union, European Commission

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Bena Properties v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Bena Properties Co. SA v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Cham Holding v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Cham Holding Co. SA v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Drex Technologies v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Drex Technologies SA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-414/16 Drex Technologies v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Almashreq Investment Fund v Council

Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Almashreq Investment Fund against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-415/16 Almashreq Investment Find v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Souruh v Council

Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Souruh SA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-440/16 Souruh v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Souruh SA v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 23 February 2021 by Maen Haikal against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-189/19, Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 July 2016 (Extracts) — Samir Hassan v Council of the European Union (Case T-790/14)

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 February 2012 — Samir Hassan v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2015 — Fares Al-Chihabi v Council of the European Union (Case T-593/11)

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2011 — Fares Al-Chihabi v Council of the European Union (Case T-593/11 R)

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 21 May 2014 — Lian Catinis v European Commission

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2016 (Extracts) — HX v Council of the European Union (Case T-723/14)

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Tarif Akhras v Council of the European Union (Case T-579/11 R)

Order of the President of the Court of 19 July 2012 — Tarif Akhras v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 12 March 2014 — Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber), 16 July 2014 — Samir Hassan v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 4 February 2014 — Syrian Lebanese Commercial Bank SAL v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 13 September 2013 — Eyad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition), 5 November 2014 — Adib Mayaleh v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 March 2017 — George Haswani v Council of the European Union (Case T-231/15)

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 October 2016 — Mohamad Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council of the European Union (Case T-153/15)

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 April 2015 — Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion v European Commission (Case T-320/09)

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber), 13 November 2014 — Aiman Jaber v Council of the European Union

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — Nizar Assaad v Council of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 25 October 2012 — Appeal – Application for interim measures – Restrictive measures against Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Application for suspension of operation and interim measures – Lack of any urgency

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 April 2011 — Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion v European Commission (Case T-320/09)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 — Alkarim for Trade and Industry LLC v Council of the European Union (Case T-35/15)

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012 — Sviluppo Globale GEIE v European Commission (Case T-183/10)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 31 May 2018 — Khaled Kaddour v Council of the European Union (Case T-461/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2018 — Razan Othman v Council of the European Union (Case T-416/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2020 (Extracts) — Khaled Zubedi v Council of the European Union (Case T-186/19)

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-542/17)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018 — Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Case T-506/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 January 2019 — Cham Holding v Council of the European Union (Case T-413/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 January 2019 — Bena Properties Co. SA v Council of the European Union (Case T-412/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 31 January 2019 — Mouhamad Wael Abdulkarim v Council of the European Union (Case T-559/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 January 2019 — George Haswani v Council of the European Union (Case T-477/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council of the European Union (Case T-415/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 June 2018 — HX v Council of the European Union (Case T-408/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-588/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2018 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union (Case T-411/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-540/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 April 2019 (Extracts) — Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union (Case T-5/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2018 — Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Case T-409/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Souruh SA v Council of the European Union (Case T-440/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-539/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-591/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-590/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 31 January 2019 — Alkarim for Trade and Industry LLC v Council of the European Union (Case T-667/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 April 2021 — Mazen Al-Tarazi v Council of the European Union (Case T-260/19)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union (Case T-56/19)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — Cham Holding Co. SA and Bena Properties Co. SA v Council of the European Union (Case T-55/19)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union (Case T-61/19)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Case T-57/19)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Case T-59/19)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — Razan Othman v Council of the European Union (Case T-58/19)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council of the European Union (Case T-62/19)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — Souruh SA v Council of the European Union (Case T-137/19)

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-541/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union (Case T-414/16)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021 (Extracts) — Khaldoun Al Zoubi v Council of the European Union (Case T-257/19)

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — George Haswani v Council of the European Union (Case T-231/15 RENV)

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-543/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-589/17)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 May 2022 (Extracts) — Amer Foz v Council of the European Union (Case T-296/20)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 December 2020 — Nader Kalai v Council of the European Union (Case T-178/19)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021 — Samer Foz v Council of the European Union (Case T-258/19)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 March 2023 — Nizar Assaad v Council of the European Union (Case T-426/21)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 December 2020 — Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union (Case T-189/19)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2022 — Abdelkader Sabra v Council of the European Union (Case T-249/20)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2021 (Extracts) — Maher Al-Imam v Council of the European Union (Case T-203/20)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2021 — Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union (Case T-540/19)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 June 2022 — George Haswani v Council of the European Union (Case T-479/21)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2021 — Waseem Alkattan v Council of the European Union (Case T-218/20)

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 December 2020 — George Haswani v Council of the European Union (Case T-521/19)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 December 2023 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-457/22)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2024 (Extracts) — Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union (Case T-503/23)

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2022 — Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union (Case C-113/21 P)

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 January 2024 — Amer Foz v Council of the European Union (Case C-524/22 P)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 December 2023 — European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic (Case T-465/22)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 December 2024 — Mudar Al-Assad v Council of the European Union (Case T-420/23)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 May 2024 — Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union (Case T-471/22)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024 — Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union (Case T-207/22)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025 — Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Case T-387/24)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2024 — Issam Shammout v Council of the European Union (Case T-649/22)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024 — Shahla Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Case T-209/22)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024 — Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Case T-206/22)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024 — Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Case T-208/22)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2024 (Extracts) — Samer Kamal Al-Assad v Council of the European Union (Case T-370/23)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 May 2025 — Hashem Anwar Akkad v Council of the European Union (Case T-502/23)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025 — Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union (Case T-386/24)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025 — Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Case T-388/24)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025 — Hala Almaghout v Council of the European Union (Case T-437/23)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025 — Issam Shammout v Council of the European Union (Case T-413/24)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025 — Cham Wings Airlines LLC v Council of the European Union (Case T-415/24)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025 — Al-Aqeelah Takaful Insurance Company v Council of the European Union (Case T-409/24)

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026 — Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union (Case T-176/24)

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 May 2017 — Mouhamad Wael Abdulkarim v Council of the European Union (Case T-304/15)

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 October 2026 — Anas Talas v Council of the European Union (Case T-561/25)

The General Court annuls the restrictive measures imposed on Mr Mohamad Nedal Alchaar solely because of his status as a former Syrian Minister of Economy and Trade

The General Court annuls the inclusion of Syria International Islamic Bank in the list of entities subject to the restrictive measures against Syria

The General Court confirms the entry of Ms Bushra al-Assad, sister of the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, on the list of persons subject to restrictive measures taken against Syria

The General Court confirms the inclusion of a Lebanese bank in the list of entities subject to the restrictive measures against Syria

The General Court dismisses the actions brought by two Syrian nationals challenging their inclusion on the list relating to freezing of funds in the context of restrictive measures taken against Syria

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 January 2016. — Mohammad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private life — Proportionality. — Case T-443/13.

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 April 2012. — Samir Hassan v Council of the European Union. — Interim relief — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for interim relief — Fresh application — Absence of new facts — Inadmissibility. — Case T‑572/11 R II.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 October 2016. — Khaled Kaddour v Council of the European Union. — Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Annulment of prior measures by a judgment of the General Court — New measures including the applicant’s name on the lists — Action for annulment — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Content of the application — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business. — Case T-155/15.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2016. — Tri Ocean Energy v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment. — Case T-719/14.

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 May 2017. — Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to protection of reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Proportionality. — Case T-410/16.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2014. — Khaled Kaddour v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Period for bringing proceedings — Partial inadmissibility — Locus standi — Burden of proof — Adjustment of temporal effects of annulment. — Case T‑654/11.

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 September 2015. — Eyad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union. — Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private life — Proportionality — Force of res judicata — Time-limit for bringing an action — Admissibility — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law. — Case T-441/13.

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 May 2015. — Aiman Jaber v Council of the European Union. — Application for interim measures — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds and restriction on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Failure to comply with procedural requirements — Inadmissibility. — Case T-154/15 R.

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014. — Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union. — Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation. — Case T‑407/13.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 October 2016. — Aiman Jaber v Council of the European Union. — Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Annulment of prior measures by a judgment of the General Court — New measures including the applicant's name on the lists — Action for annulment — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Content of the application — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business. — Case T-154/15.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 July 2014. — Mohamad Nedal Alchaar v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Entry of an individual on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Links with the regime — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy. — Case T‑203/12.

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 May 2015. — Khaled Kaddour v Council of the European Union. — Application for interim measures — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds and restriction on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Failure to comply with procedural requirements — Inadmissibility. — Case T-155/15 R.

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 May 2015. — Mohamad Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council of the European Union. — Application for interim measures — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds and restriction on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Failure to comply with procedural requirements — Inadmissibility. — Case T-153/15 R.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2014. — Syria International Islamic Bank PJSC v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Manifest error of assessment — Burden of proof — Claim for damages. — Case T‑293/12.

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2013. — Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Burden of proof — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of defence — Obligation to state reasons — Procedure by default — Application to intervene — No need to adjudicate. — Case T‑563/11.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 January 2015. — Mohammad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to privacy — Proportionality. — Case T‑509/11.

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2013. — Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Presumption of innocence — Burden of proof — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of defence — Obligation to state reasons. — Case T‑592/11.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 May 2017. — Ahmad Barqawi v Council of the European Union. — Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Manifest error of assessment. — Case T-303/15.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2014. — Mazen Al-Tabbaa v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the European Union — Rights of defence — Right to an effective judicial remedy — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment. — Joined Cases T‑329/12 and T‑74/13.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2014. — Mohamad Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Period for bringing proceedings — Partial inadmissibility — Locus standi — Burden of proof — Adjustment of temporal effects of annulment. — Case T‑43/12.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2016. — Tri-Ocean Trading v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment. — Case T-709/14.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 February 2015. — Bassam Sabbagh v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Manifest error of assessment — Non-contractual liability. — Case T‑652/11.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2016. — Mohamed Farahat v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment. — Case T-830/14.

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2025 (Extracts). — Amer Foz v Council of the European Union. — Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criterion of association with a person or entity subject to restrictive measures – Fall of the regime of Bashar Al-Assad – Error of assessment. — Case T-414/24.