محكمة العدل الأوروبية

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-563/11 Anbouba v Council

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

Appeals — Restrictive measures against Syria — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Listing criterion — Broad discretion available to the Council — Burden of proof

Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-592/11 Anbouba v Council

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 — Scope — Recognition of a private divorce pronounced by a religious court in a third country — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Restrictive measures against a person listed in an annex to a decision

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Restrictive measures against a person listed in an annex to a decision

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection

References for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Borders, asylum and immigration — Rules on the grant of refugee status

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 — Article 25(1)(a) — Visa with limited territorial validity — Issuing of a visa on humanitarian grounds or because of international obligations

Area of freedom, security and justice – Borders, asylum and immigration

Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU-Turkey statement of the European Council of 18 March 2016 — Application for annulment

Appeal — Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Admissibility — Procedure for modifying the application — Need to modify the pleas in law and arguments — Restrictive measures adopted against the Syrian Arab Republic — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name

Appeal — Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Admissibility — Procedure for modification of the application — Need to modify pleas in law and arguments — Restrictive measures against Syria — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name

Appeal brought on 31 July 2017 by Rami Makhlouf against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 18 May 2017 in Case T-410/16, Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria and against influential members of the Assad and Makhlouf families — Rights of defence — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2018 — Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union, European Commission

Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded

Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded

Appeal brought on 17 August 2018 by HX against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 June 2018 in Case T-408/16 HX v Council of the European Union

Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria – List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Ehab Makhlouf against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-409/16 Makhlouf v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Othman v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Razan Othman v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Razan Othman against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-416/16 Othman v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-411/16 Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — Conditions for granting refugee status — Directive 2011/95/EU

Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Syria

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 July 2020 — George Haswani v Council of the European Union, European Commission

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Bena Properties v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Bena Properties Co. SA v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Cham Holding v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Cham Holding Co. SA v Council of the European Union

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Drex Technologies v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Drex Technologies SA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-414/16 Drex Technologies v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Almashreq Investment Fund v Council

Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Almashreq Investment Fund against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-415/16 Almashreq Investment Find v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Souruh v Council

Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Souruh SA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-440/16 Souruh v Council

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 – Souruh SA v Council of the European Union

Appeal brought on 23 February 2021 by Maen Haikal against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-189/19, Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union