Appeal brought on 17 August 2018 by HX against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 June 2018 in Case T-408/16 HX v Council of the European Union
Appeal brought on 17 August 2018 by HX against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 June 2018 in Case T-408/16 HX v Council of the European Union
(Case C-540/18P)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Parties
Appellant: HX (represented by S. Koev)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
Declare the present appeal to be admissible and well founded in its entirety and declare all the grounds of appeal set out in support of the present appeal to be well founded;
Declare that the contested decision of the General Court under appeal may be annulled in its entirety;
Set aside the entirety of judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 19 June 2018, HX v Council, T-408/16;
Partially annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 amending Decision 2013/255, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/840 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (OJ 2016, L 141, p. 30), Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/917 amending Decision 2013/255 (OJ 2017, L 139, p. 62) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/907 of 29 May 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (OJ 2017, L 139, p. 15) in so far as they concern HX;
Order the Council to pay all the appellant’s costs, expenses, fees and other expenditure linked to his defence.
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
1. Error in the application of the law by the General Court, resulting in an infringement of EU law, in so far as it found that the Council correctly applied the presumption that the appellant was a prominent businessman carrying out his business in Syria, given that that presumption has no legal basis and is disproportionate in relation to the legal objective pursued.
2. Error in the application of the law, resulting in an infringement of the rules on evidence, on account of the lack of evidence for the purposes of applying the presumption and the refusal to apply Articles 27(3) and 28(3) of Decision 2013/255 amended by Decision 2015/1836.
3. Error in the application of the law, resulting in an infringement of procedural rules which adversely affect the interests of the appellant, on account of the refusal to admit new evidence produced in accordance with Article 85(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
المعلومات الأساسية
تاريخ الصدور
iranDocument
رقم الوثيقة
نوع الوثيقة
اللغة
كود الذاكرة السورية
الجهة المصدرة
وثائق أخرى للجهة المصدرة
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2016/04/07
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 — Scope — Recognition of a private divorce pronounced by a religious court in a third country — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2016/05/12
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2016/04/07
Appeals — Restrictive measures against Syria — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Listing criterion — Broad discretion available to the Council — Burden of proof
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/01/08
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-563/11 Anbouba v Council
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/01/08
Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-592/11 Anbouba v Council
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/01/31
شخصيات مرتبطة
لايوجد معلومات حالية
كيانات متعلقة
لايوجد معلومات حالية
يوميات مرتبطة
لايوجد معلومات حالية