Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Ehab Makhlouf against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-409/16 Makhlouf v Council
Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Ehab Makhlouf against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-409/16 Makhlouf v Council
(Case C-157/19 P)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Ehab Makhlouf (represented by: E. Ruchat, avocat)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The appellant submits that the Court should:
Declare the appellant’s action admissible and well founded;
Accordingly, set aside the judgment of 12 December 2018 given by the General Court of the European Union in Case T-409/16, Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union;
And, giving judgment itself,
Annul Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 1 and its subsequent implementing acts, in so far as they concern the appellant;
Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
In support of his appeal, the appellant relies on three grounds:
The first ground of appeal, alleging an error of law in that the General Court disregarded the applicant’s right to be heard prior to the adoption of new restrictive measures, as enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
The second ground of appeal, alleging an error of law and distortion of the facts in so far as the General Court disregarded the items submitted by the applicant in support of his action for annulment to demonstrate that he did not support the Syrian regime;
The third ground of appeal, alleging an error of law in so far as the General Court did not hold that Articles 27 and 28 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP, 2 according to which membership of the Al-Assad or Makhlouf families constitutes an autonomous criterion justifying the imposition of sanctions, were illegal and in so far as it, on the same occasion, reversed the burden of proof.
____________
1 Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ L 141, p. 125).
2 Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ L 147, p. 14).
المعلومات الأساسية
تاريخ الصدور
iranDocument
رقم الوثيقة
نوع الوثيقة
اللغة
كود الذاكرة السورية
الجهة المصدرة
وثائق أخرى للجهة المصدرة
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2016/04/07
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 — Scope — Recognition of a private divorce pronounced by a religious court in a third country — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2016/05/12
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2016/04/07
Appeals — Restrictive measures against Syria — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Listing criterion — Broad discretion available to the Council — Burden of proof
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/01/08
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/04/21
Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-563/11 Anbouba v Council
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/01/08
Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-592/11 Anbouba v Council
نوع الوثيقة:
قرار / حكم قضائي
الجهة المصدرة:
محكمة العدل الأوروبية
تاريخ الصدور:
2015/01/31
شخصيات مرتبطة
كيانات متعلقة
لايوجد معلومات حالية
يوميات مرتبطة
لايوجد معلومات حالية