الذاكرة السورية هي ملك لكل السوريين. يستند عملنا إلى المعايير العلمية، وينبغي أن تكون المعلومات دقيقة وموثوقة، وألّا تكتسي أيّ صبغة أيديولوجية. أرسلوا إلينا تعليقاتكم لإثراء المحتوى.أرسل ملاحظة

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 February 2012 — Samir Hassan v Council of the European Union

INFORMATION ON UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS

Reports of Cases

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 February 2012 — Hassan v Council

(Case T-572/11 R)

(Interim measures — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria —

Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency —

Weighing up of interests)

EN

1.

Application for interim measures — Suspension of operation of a measure — Interim measures —

Conditions for granting — Prima facie case — Urgency — Serious and irreparable damage —

Cumulative nature — Balancing of all the interests involved — Order of examination and method

of verification — Discretion of the court hearing the application for interim relief (Arts 256(1)

TFEU, 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see

paras 14-16)

2.

Application for interim measures — Suspension of operation of a measure — Interim measures —

Conditions for granting — Urgency — Serious and irreparable damage — Causal link between the

alleged damage and the contested act — Burden of proof (Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of

Procedure of the General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 21, 22)

3.

Application for interim measures — Suspension of operation of a measure — Interim measures —

Conditions for granting — Urgency — Serious and irreparable damage — Financial loss —

Situation which could jeopardise the existence of the applicant company — Assessment in the light

of the situation of the group to which the applicant belongs — Application to a natural person

exercising control over that company (Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the

General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 33-36)

4.

Application for interim measures — Suspension of operation of a measure — Interim measures —

Conditions for granting — Urgency — Serious and irreparable damage — Financial loss —

Situation which could jeopardise the existence of the applicant company — Burden of proof

(Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see

paras 38-40)

5.

Application for interim measures — Suspension of operation of a measure — Conditions for

granting — Serious and irreparable damage — Financial loss — Damage which may subsequently

be made good by compensation or by means of an action for damages — Damage which cannot be

regarded as irreparable (Arts 268 TFEU, 278 TFEU and 340 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the

General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see para. 47)

ECLI:EU:T:2012:83

1

INFORMATION ON UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS

6.

Application for interim measures — Suspension of operation of a measure — Conditions for

granting — Urgency — Serious and irreparable damage — Burden of proof — Serious and

irreparable damage for the applicant — Interest of the applicant affected — Interests of third

parties affected — Not included (Art. 278 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

Art. 104(2)) (see para. 50)

7.

Application for interim measures — Suspension of operation of a measure — Conditions for

granting — Balancing of all the interests involved — Concept (Art. 278 TFEU; Rules of Procedure

of the General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 53, 54)

Re:

APPLICATION for interim measures, in particular, application for suspension of operation of Council

Implementing Decision 2011/515/CFSP of 23 August 2011 implementing Decision 2011/273/CFSP

concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 218, p. 20) and of Council Implementing

Regulation (EU) No 843/2011 of 23 August 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011

concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 218, p. 1) insofar as those

texts refer to the applicant.

Operative part

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2.

Costs are reserved.

2

ECLI:EU:T:2012:83


أمر من رئيس المحكمة العامة الأوروبية برفض طلب سمير حسن تعليق تنفيذ العقوبات المفروضة عليه، لعدم توافر عنصر الاستعجال.

المعلومات الأساسية

تاريخ الصدور

2012/02/17

البلد المستهدف

سورية

رقم الوثيقة

T-572/11 — CELEX 62011TO0572

مصدر الوثيقة

EUR-Lex — محكمة العدل الأوروبية

المجموعات

الاتحاد الأوربي

نوع المصدر

مصدر أصلي

نوع الوثيقة

قرار / حكم قضائي

العنوان الأصلي للوثيقة

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 February 2012 — Samir Hassan v Council of the European Union

التصنيف الفرعي

قرار عقوبات

اللغة

الإنجليزية

كود الذاكرة السورية

SMI/A200/995880

وثائق أخرى للجهة المصدرة

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2016/04/07

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 — Scope — Recognition of a private divorce pronounced by a religious court in a third country — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2016/05/12

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2015/04/21

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia — Distortion of the sense of the evidence

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2016/04/07

Appeals — Restrictive measures against Syria — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the regime — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Listing criterion — Broad discretion available to the Council — Burden of proof

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2015/01/08

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2015/04/21

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2015/04/21

Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded — Set of indicia

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2015/04/21

Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-563/11 Anbouba v Council

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2015/01/08

Appeal brought on 25 November 2013 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 September 2013 in Case T-592/11 Anbouba v Council

نوع الوثيقة:

قرار / حكم قضائي

الجهة المصدرة:

محكمة العدل الأوروبية

تاريخ الصدور:

2015/01/31

كيانات متعلقة

شخصيات مرتبطة

لايوجد معلومات حالية

يوميات مرتبطة

لايوجد معلومات حالية

درجة الموثوقية:

الوثيقة

  • صحيحة
  • غير صحيحة
  • لم يتم التأكد من صحتها
  • غير محدد